Neuroleadership: Lead in a Way That Will Engage People’s Minds

By Manie Bosman

A few days ago I was in a bookstore and just about to pay when the cashier – a young lady – was interrupted by a colleague demanding to know why she had left her lunch box out on the table in the back room where I presume the staff took their meals. The cashier blushed, mumbled some vague reply and then went along to make a complete hash of the transaction, punching the wrong keys and making more mistakes as she tried to rectify the mess.

What I was witnessing was the activation of a strong “withdraw” response in the hapless cashier’s brain – a neurological process where her brain’s limbic system registered a social “threat” (her colleague’s insensitive behaviour in front of me, the client), kicking her brain into survival mode and subsequently severely impairing her cognitive performance. Plainly put, her brain’s ability to understand, make decisions, solve problems and communicate was weakened as it tried to deal with what it perceived as an emotional threat.

How does this happen? As discussed in my previous post on neuroleadership, research in the field of neuroscience is showing that our brains react to perceived “threats” and “rewards” in the social environment in the same way and with the same intensity with which it reacts to physical threats (e.g. a predator, pain) and rewards (e.g. food, money). So when your brain perceives a social “reward” (e.g. receiving recognition) an automated positive “engage” circuitry is activated. On the other hand, when you are humiliated (a perceived “threat”, as in the case of the cashier), the same neural circuitry is activated as when you are confronted by a gang of thugs or a dangerous predator.

When a threat response is activated the brain allocates fewer resources to the prefrontal cortex (where most conscious thought takes place, hence making us a little ‘dumber’ for a while) as these resources are needed to activate and sustain other areas of the brain where automated “fight or flight” reactions are managed. The young cashier’s ability to perform the simple routine action of ringing up my purchase was thus disrupted as her stressed and undernourished prefrontal cortex simultaneously tried to work its way through the perceived social threat (being humiliated) and ringing up my purchase. In stead of automatically doing what she probably does a hundred times or more a day, she was now trying to concentrate on what she had to do and at the same time figure out how to deal with the rude behaviour of her colleague. With so much going on in her already undernourished prefrontal cortex, her brain simply ‘choked’, causing her to make a total mess of what she was trying to do.

The fact is, each day millions of similar scenario’s play out in banks, corporate offices, supermarkets, waiting rooms, at filling stations, in churches, holiday resorts, meeting rooms, on playgrounds, in mosques, on trains and buses, in military bases, lecture halls, movie theatres, sport stadiums, restaurants and wherever else people interact with each other. Our brains automatically react to perceived threats or rewards in the social environment, triggering either an “engage” or “disengage” neural response.

So, how can leaders and managers best make use of this new insight, triggering more “reward-engage” responses and avoiding “threat-disengage” responses? David Rock, author of the seminal Your Brain at Work and the man who coined the term “neuroleadership”, has devised the SCARF-model based on five social needs our human brains have (Status, Certainty, Autonomy, Relatedness and Fairness). Research in neuroscience have shown that it is these specific social needs which can activate the same reward or threat circuitries in our brains that physical rewards or threats can activate. Understanding that the human brain is primarily a social organ which perceives the workplace as a social environment can help leaders manage and facilitate these needs to the benefit of the individual and team:


Status refers to our social need for comparative importance, significance, respect, esteem, and a place in the social “pecking order”. Several studies even found that for our brains, social status (aka sociometric status – how we are viewed by our peers) and respect are more rewarding and important than money or wealth (socioeconomic status). Also interesting although perhaps not directly relevant are other studies which found status to be the most significant determinant of human longevity and health! In the workplace and other social environments typical threats to status would be someone with a superior attitude, receiving negative feedback, failing in a way that makes you feel inferior, receiving patronizing advice, being left out of the group, being humiliated (the teller again), and receiving disapproving performance reviews. The status reward response can be triggered by a promotion, being publicly acknowledged, winning, receiving positive feedback, learning a new skill which increases your standing or just being respected.


Certainty refers to the human brain’s yearning to know what will happen next. Our brains are constantly assessing patterns in the environment and it prefers familiar patterns which indicate safe and easily predictable outcomes. Unfamiliar patterns causes the brain to go into an alerted state, which burns more resources as it uses the energy-hungry prefrontal cortex to process and assess the unfamiliar pattern. Not only is this energy-sapping, it also causes stress and impairs our ability to make decisions, store and retrieve information, solve problems and think creatively. Threats to certainty can include telling half-truths (hiding information), inconsistency, radical change, job-insecurity, new experiences or places and meeting strangers. Reward-responses can be triggered by familiar places, consistency, feelings of security and stability.


Autonomy refers to the brain’s craving to feel that we have choices about what to do and not to do and that we have at least some level of control over our environment and circumstances. One study indicated that by simply allowing people to make some autonomous decisions we can increase their motivation and engagement by up to five times! In the workplace our need for autonomy can be threatened by micro management, working in teams with very strict guidelines and policies, authoritarian ‘command and control’ leadership, and inflexible rules. A reward-response can be triggered by participating in decision-making, organizing your own workflow or even choosing what to focus on, self-directed learning, and own time management.


Relatedness refers to our need to feel safe with other people and to feel that we are part of the group. This need also includes the brain’s constant assessment of people as either ‘friends’ or ‘foes’. Strangers, or anyone who looks or sounds different from those I perceive as ‘my people’ (e.g. different race or culture), could trigger a threat just because my brain perceives them as not being part of the group with whom I feel safe.

Some fascinating research by Naomi Eisenberger and her team at UCLA’s Department of Social Psychology showed that social rejection activates the same reaction in the brain as physical pain. She explains that when people feel unwanted or left out, they frequently describe their feelings with terms also used to describe physical pain, such as suffering from ‘hurt feelings’ or a ‘broken heart’. “Our research has shown that feeling socially excluded activates some of the same neural regions that are activated in response to physical pain, suggesting that social rejection may indeed be painful.” In other words, the brain experiences social pain in the same way as physical pain – it’s real and not just ‘emotional’. In the workplace and other social environments threats to our need for relatedness can be triggered when you are being ignored, perceive that you are being excluded from the group (even by just hearing a remark such as “everybody is tired of you always being late…”), rejection, starting to work with a new team, being alone among strangers, or working in a culture other than your own. Neural rewards could be triggered by feeling included, feeling trusted, friendship, pursuing common goals, being coaching (experiencing it as an investment being made in your future with the group).


Fairness refers to our need for fair exchanges. According to Rock, experiencing fairness or unfairness again activates the same network that registers real physical pain or pleasure. He points out that throughout history people had been willing to go to extreme lengths – including sacrificing their lives – to right injustice and unfairness. Perhaps less dramatic but equally significant for leaders are recent studies which have indicated that for your brain (assuming you’re not reading this while on trial for money laundering), fairness could be more important than money. Threats to our brains’ need for fairness can be triggered by broken promises (explicit or implicit promises), expectations not being met, different rules or standards for different people, and inconsistency. Rewards for fairness can be triggered by keeping commitments and promises, maintaining transparency, open communication, and admitting mistakes.

So what’s the bottom line here? Your brain and the brains of the people that you interact with each day are strongly influenced by how it perceives the social environment in which you operate. When it perceives a social threat (real or not) it automatically goes into the neurological version of your car’s ‘limp mode’ – functioning well below its best when needed to make decisions, remember, solve problems or collaborate with others. When it perceives a social reward the opposite happens – it goes into high engagement mode where it is best able to think creatively, plan, remember, memorize, solve problems, and communicate. In a world where employee engagement has probably become the greatest single success factor for any organization, leaders who are serious about accomplishing success cannot afford to ignore this.

About Manie Bosman

Manie Bosman is Founder and CEO of the Strategic Leadership Institute. He is a leadership development consultant specializing in the emerging fields of neuroleadership and neurosafety. Based in Pretoria, South Africa, Manie has more than 20 years of international experience in cross-cultural interaction, diversity management, change management, public speaking, communication, corporate training and team development. He holds a Masters of Arts in Organizational Leadership and believes that effective leadership is the key determiner of success in any venture, group or organization.
This entry was posted in Leadership, Neuroleadership, Neuroscience, Talent Development and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

23 Responses to Neuroleadership: Lead in a Way That Will Engage People’s Minds

  1. Reblogged this on Brainwaves For Leaders and commented:
    This is a great summary from Manie Bosman, and we have been exploring these concepts with the students in our Diploma of Neuroscience of Leadership. In particular, the implications of “choking” and an overloaded Prefrontal Cortex on performance and decision making.
    This was also highlighted in our last blog on supporting insight. We hope you enjoy this blog as much as we did.

    • Manie Bosman says:

      Thank you for reblogging and also for the great posts on your side – I thoroughly enjoy reading them and will surely reblog from time to time now that I’ve discovered your blog!

  2. Manie,
    A wonderful elaboration on the power of social neurobiology and its impact on management practices. This information needs to become common knowledge because it will transform the way we think about and structure work.
    As you know, I’ve written several articles on neuroscience and management and recently a 2 part look at David Rock’s brillant model, SCARF. As you have shown here, its application touchs on every facet of work performance.

    As you say, “The fact is, each day millions of similar scenario’s play out in banks, corporate offices, supermarkets, waiting rooms, at filling stations, in churches, holiday resorts, meeting rooms, etc.” Once we come to truly comprehend this, we cannot continue to conduct our lives and work in the same way.


  3. Manie Bosman says:

    Thank you Louise. I share your ‘frustration’ with the fact that so many leaders still fail to grasp the potential impact of applying the findings from neuroscience to leadership. In a time when employee engagement is the critical factor for success, neuroleadership offers an amazing opportunity to build engagement, yet many struggle to see this. I guess we just need to continue spreading the word to help create momentum and reach a tipping point for the adoption of these principles in leadership practice!

  4. Anton Venter says:

    This is brilliant and practical. Thanks Manie, will definately use this in our training programs. What role does emotional intelligence training play in a leaders’ ability to use this model for creating employee engagement?

  5. Manie Bosman says:

    Thanks Anton. I would say that if the emotional intelligence training results in real change of behaviour it could definitely help leaders align their leadership style with the principles of neuroleadership, which should then surely result in higher engagement. However, another practical approach that I’m now experimenting with is to start with the behavioral change but in small, in fact VERY small steps based on BJ Fogg’s Behavior Model (see and tips on it’s application here: I find this model fascinating and very useful in practice – I’ve actually written an article on it but will only be posting it after my next post (which, by the way, focuses on what neuroscience reveals about the differences in impact between negative and positive social interactions).

    How is the leadership programme getting on? I’ve been a little out of touch lately but you should give me a shout if there’s anything I could do to help, you guys are making a great difference in so many lives!

  6. Russell Harlow says:

    Hi Manie,

    A great summary of a genuinely engaging concept. I have also been looking into neurological triggers in the field of decision making and influential leadership. I have found the approach of helping leaders (especially those trying to influence without direct authority to do so) to imagine themselves as “choice-architects” is an effective way of way of describing the relationship they have with those they are trying to influence. So, in this SCARF context, the Autonomy social need works well as it taps into the human need for making our own choices (even when we are actually in a state of ‘being influenced’)/

  7. Manie Bosman says:

    Thank you Russel! I love the \”choice-architects” concept – how do you define/describe this? I\’m also digging around on the topic of decision making, in particular how behaviour can be changed to make different/improved decisions. Have a look at these if you have a moment: (influence of emotion); and (language); (groupthink) and (fee will) and finally (again questioning free will). Would love to hear more about “choice-architects”, meanwhile stay well and enjoy the Olympics!

  8. Pingback: You Might Not Like it, But Bad is Stronger than Good | strategicleaders

  9. Pingback: The Neuroscience of Conditioned Racism | strategicleaders

  10. Pingback: Become a Better Leader by Taking Giant Leaps in Baby Steps | strategicleaders

  11. Pingback: Improve Your Leadership Effectiveness by Taking Giant Leaps in Small Steps | strategicleaders

  12. Pingback: Change Your Leadership Habits by Taking Giant Leaps in Small Steps | strategicleaders

  13. Pingback: Glass Half Empty | Landscaping | Landscape Care & Ideas

  14. Pingback: Your Caveman Brain: Running From Predators at Work | strategicleaders

  15. Way cool! Some very valid points! I appreciate you writing this article and
    also the rest of the site is extremely good.

  16. Andre says:

    Hi Manie,

    Thanks for sharing this article. This is very usefull in understanding the WHY and HOW of engaging with your followers and everyone else for that matter.

  17. Pingback: Your Caveman Brain: Running From Predators At Work | Leadership Platform

  18. Pingback: Neurosafety: The New Science of Safety Leadership | strategicleaders

  19. Very good info. Lucky me I discovered your website by accident (stumbleupon).
    I have book marked it for later!

  20. Situasi yang paling membingungkan pada zaman perjudian sekarang merupakan dalam memilih agen taruhan bola terpercaya dari SBOBET,
    kami selaku agen besar serta terpercaya dalam dunia betting online siap membantu kita dalam mengakses dan menyediakan panduan kepada anda di bermain SBOBET,
    akses ekspress yang kami berikan merupakan hal nyata tanpa bohong belaka.
    Telah banyak pejudi online yang bergabung dengan kami dalam bermain BOLA
    TANGKAS judi bola online, kedatangan anda kami akan sering tunggu
    dengan senang hati dan operator kami sering siap membantu anda
    bila mengalami kesulitan. SBOBET gak sembarangan dalam
    memberikan jaringan kepada agen judi online karena hanya agen betting online terpercaya dan mempunyai reputasi baik seperti kami yang dipercaya
    SBOBET pada menyediakan permainannya yaitu CMIDN.

    SBOBET memiliki banyak pengagum terutama penggila taruhan football online,
    dari kalangan buah hati muda bahkan orang tua memilih SBOBET sebagai spouse mereka dalam bermain judi bola
    online, SBOBET amat memiliki banyak agen luas dan terpercaya dalam perkara ini kami adalah
    diantaranya, promo-promo sering kami berikan kepada anda member anyar
    ataupun member lama, oleh sebab itu, buat apa anda menunggu lagi cepat bergabung dengan kami dan rasakan serunya taruhan bola
    online SGD777 bersama kami agen tersohor. Kami agen judi popular memiliki dukungan penuh yang SBOBET dalam
    memberikan hubungan dalam bermain Judi Lisonjero Online,
    Keamanan dan kedamaian dalam betting adalah sesuatu penting bagi kami, sama sekali tanpa memandang masalah kecil ataupun besar kami
    sebagai bandar taruhan online profesional sering mengatasi hal seperti
    tersebut dengan cepat.

  21. soldier says:

    Thank ʏou for the ausⲣicious writeup. Ιt if tгuth be
    told was а amusemеnt аccount it. Look cοmplex to far delivered agreeable from yⲟu!

    Howeѵer, how could wе keep in touch?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s